By the title, it sounds like a bad edition of TMI Tuesday to hop back on the bandwagon with, but what the heck.
1. Do you believe in marriage?
Yes, I do. Surprised? I am. While I don’t necessarily think it is for everybody, and I really question the whole “one person forever” thing, it does work for some people, so yes, I do believe.
2. What is marriage to you?
Marriage is a commitment between two people. It doesn’t necessarily mean monogomy, it certainly doesn’t mean “people of the opposite sex” it is the cojoining of two people into a loving commitment to each other.
3. If you are married, why did you do it? If you are not, why have you not married?
Why? That is a question I ask myself every day. At the time, I thought I had found the right person that shared a common belief system, and we had a lot in common. Firming that commitment up seemed like the right decision… at the time.
4. Do you believe in divorce?
Sure, I do. People can make mistakes. People change. If you are not compatible (and have nothing else to tie you in), then why would you not get a divorce. You have a husband that beats you, and you are supposed to “tough it out” because somebody says that anything else is “wrong?” Dumb.
5. If you are divorced, why did you do it? If you have not, are there certain circumstances under which you would agree to a divorce?
Incompatibility of any sort is acceptable reasons, in general to get a divorce. Children certainly make a difference, but is not solely a reason to stay… depending on circumstances. Any physically abusive relationship is and should be dead in the water immediately. There is nothing to save in that scenario (except perhaps somebodies life). Anything that hurts the kids or risks harm is reason. (Alcoholic, gambler, drug use, etc). Religion is NOT a reason to stay together. Every religion has an “out” for exceptional circumstances, meaning that higher spiritual being understands in “certain circumstances” there are reasons that a person needs to get out. Just because your priest, minister, rabbi, cleric or other religious “authority” doesn’t agree… (s)he is not the final judge, and can not say with any absolute authority which is or isn’t a “valid” reason.
Bonus (as in optional): [ed note:I am not trying to spark a get political debate, I am much to superficial for that]Do you believe that same sex marriages are a threat to traditional marriages?
Well, I hit on this in one of the above questions, but allow me to expound to be clear. There is no valid reason that members of the same sex should not be allowed to “marry” in a legal sense. If a particular faith does not choose to recognize it, that is their choice and right to do so… it is their belief system and they can believe whatever they wish. However, there is no valid legal reason for this.
A long time ago, interracial and interfaith marriages were viewed as poorly as gay marriage is today. In some areas of the country, and in some religious organizations, such things are still viewed as an “abomination” by those people. But the government has (correctly) taken no steps to attempt to outlaw marriages of this sort. Same thing with divorce. Since some churches choose not to recognize a divorce, they will not marry that person again. So, there are “civil ceremonies” which allow marriage from a legal perspective whether or not it is condoned by any particular religion. The same should hold true here.
To the silly question, is it a “threat” to marriage? Of course not. It is a threat to the control that certain religious faction attempt to hold over people, and their claim to “absolute” power. But it is not a threat to marriage in general. Marriage is about commitment, and some will say about love. Anything that promotes that, whether it be between a man and a woman, two men, or two women, should be celebrated, not mocked. Anything less is really self defeating to the “institution” of marriage.